<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss
version="2.0"
xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
> <channel><title>Comments for vedovini.net</title> <atom:link href="http://vedovini.net/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><link>http://vedovini.net</link> <description>Founded in 1969, building software since 1985.</description> <lastBuildDate>Sun, 02 Jun 2013 17:09:13 +0000</lastBuildDate> <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> <item><title>Comment on The case for Vertical Videos by Claude Vedovini</title><link>http://vedovini.net/2013/04/the-case-for-vertical-videos/#comment-3650</link> <dc:creator>Claude Vedovini</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sun, 02 Jun 2013 17:09:13 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://vedovini.net/?p=1289#comment-3650</guid> <description><![CDATA[&gt; that is mostly what people want.I don&#039;t agree, people have a practical sense of what they are doing. Vertical videos are not shoot because people don&#039;t know any better or ignore that they don&#039;t want to do that. Tilting the device is not really a hard thing to do for anyone. They do it because the format fits what they are shooting.And again, if YouTube was doing its job right, there won&#039;t be a problem...]]></description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>> that is mostly what people want.</p><p>I don&#8217;t agree, people have a practical sense of what they are doing. Vertical videos are not shoot because people don&#8217;t know any better or ignore that they don&#8217;t want to do that. Tilting the device is not really a hard thing to do for anyone. They do it because the format fits what they are shooting.</p><p>And again, if YouTube was doing its job right, there won&#8217;t be a problem&#8230;</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>Comment on The case for Vertical Videos by David Neal</title><link>http://vedovini.net/2013/04/the-case-for-vertical-videos/#comment-3649</link> <dc:creator>David Neal</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sun, 02 Jun 2013 16:40:24 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://vedovini.net/?p=1289#comment-3649</guid> <description><![CDATA[i agree with brian in that i cannot think of a good reason for displaying video in anything but it&#039;s natural dimensions.  be that 4x3 or 16x9 or 9x16 or 1.85:1 or 2.39:1 or whatever.  (black bars showing is not a good reason to distort. black bars just mean that the device you are watching doesn&#039;t match the dimensions of the video being played.)  also, i think that the phone/tablet engineers should make the camera shoot 16x9 no matter what the orientation of the device, since that is mostly what people want.  an option could support 9x16, but very few people would use it.  also, TVs should not display stretched videos except with deeply hidden menus, with &quot;ARE YOU SURE YOU WANT TO SEE THIS DISTORTED PICTURE????&quot; and double or triple confirmation.  people could still do it if they wanted to, but who would?]]></description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i agree with brian in that i cannot think of a good reason for displaying video in anything but it&#8217;s natural dimensions.  be that 4&#215;3 or 16&#215;9 or 9&#215;16 or 1.85:1 or 2.39:1 or whatever.  (black bars showing is not a good reason to distort. black bars just mean that the device you are watching doesn&#8217;t match the dimensions of the video being played.)  also, i think that the phone/tablet engineers should make the camera shoot 16&#215;9 no matter what the orientation of the device, since that is mostly what people want.  an option could support 9&#215;16, but very few people would use it.  also, TVs should not display stretched videos except with deeply hidden menus, with &#8220;ARE YOU SURE YOU WANT TO SEE THIS DISTORTED PICTURE????&#8221; and double or triple confirmation.  people could still do it if they wanted to, but who would?</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>Comment on The case for Vertical Videos by brian m</title><link>http://vedovini.net/2013/04/the-case-for-vertical-videos/#comment-3647</link> <dc:creator>brian m</dc:creator> <pubDate>Fri, 31 May 2013 23:26:24 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://vedovini.net/?p=1289#comment-3647</guid> <description><![CDATA[&gt;so, we should never watch a SD video on our HDTV.Yes, in the sense that this often results in &quot;stretch-o-vision&quot; by people who are either afraid or pillarboxing (&quot;why isn&#039;t it filling the whole screen!?? make the black bars go away!!&quot;) or who don&#039;t want to pay the few extra bucks for an HD cable box.  And it&#039;s really a drag to go to sports bar with your friends only to find out they&#039;ve turned your basketball game into a &quot;basket ellipsoid&quot; game.I certainly respect the intentional use of vertical video for artistic expression, though.  It&#039;s unfortunate that this is becoming the new automatic indicator of amateur video, like the camcorder timestamp used to be.]]></description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&gt;so, we should never watch a SD video on our HDTV.</p><p>Yes, in the sense that this often results in &#8220;stretch-o-vision&#8221; by people who are either afraid or pillarboxing (&#8220;why isn&#8217;t it filling the whole screen!?? make the black bars go away!!&#8221;) or who don&#8217;t want to pay the few extra bucks for an HD cable box.  And it&#8217;s really a drag to go to sports bar with your friends only to find out they&#8217;ve turned your basketball game into a &#8220;basket ellipsoid&#8221; game.</p><p>I certainly respect the intentional use of vertical video for artistic expression, though.  It&#8217;s unfortunate that this is becoming the new automatic indicator of amateur video, like the camcorder timestamp used to be.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>Comment on On the road again by Claude Vedovini</title><link>http://vedovini.net/2013/05/on-the-road-again/#comment-3642</link> <dc:creator>Claude Vedovini</dc:creator> <pubDate>Tue, 28 May 2013 13:50:28 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://vedovini.net/?p=1321#comment-3642</guid> <description><![CDATA[Thanks for the information Olivier, most appreciated :)]]></description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for the information Olivier, most appreciated :)</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>Comment on On the road again by Olivier</title><link>http://vedovini.net/2013/05/on-the-road-again/#comment-3641</link> <dc:creator>Olivier</dc:creator> <pubDate>Tue, 28 May 2013 13:35:51 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://vedovini.net/?p=1321#comment-3641</guid> <description><![CDATA[Hello,I went twice to Japan (but quite some time ago), and loved it.Here are my 2 cents :
- Nikko (near Tokyo) is really nice (quite &quot;baroque&quot; compared to Kyoto ... but nice to compare, and could be done in a day from/to Tokyo)
- Kyoto/Nara is a must
- Osaka is really nice, but &quot;kind of&quot; provincial town compared to Tokyo
- Kobe : I was there (conference), but not really worth it in my opinion
- Himeji : (really) nice castle ... and that&#039;s all (good if you have enough time and are around ... going from Kyoto to Hiroshima for example)
- Hiroshima : worth if for the historical point ... and only for it (so ... depends on the time you have I would say as it is quite far away from the Tokyo-Kyoto axe). If you are there (and only if), consider going to Miayjima (Tori in the water)
- Okinawa : never been there, but the tropical/beach feeling of it could be worth it (depending on when you are there)Enjoy ...]]></description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hello,</p><p>I went twice to Japan (but quite some time ago), and loved it.</p><p>Here are my 2 cents :<br
/> - Nikko (near Tokyo) is really nice (quite &#8220;baroque&#8221; compared to Kyoto &#8230; but nice to compare, and could be done in a day from/to Tokyo)<br
/> - Kyoto/Nara is a must<br
/> - Osaka is really nice, but &#8220;kind of&#8221; provincial town compared to Tokyo<br
/> - Kobe : I was there (conference), but not really worth it in my opinion<br
/> - Himeji : (really) nice castle &#8230; and that&#8217;s all (good if you have enough time and are around &#8230; going from Kyoto to Hiroshima for example)<br
/> - Hiroshima : worth if for the historical point &#8230; and only for it (so &#8230; depends on the time you have I would say as it is quite far away from the Tokyo-Kyoto axe). If you are there (and only if), consider going to Miayjima (Tori in the water)<br
/> - Okinawa : never been there, but the tropical/beach feeling of it could be worth it (depending on when you are there)</p><p>Enjoy &#8230;</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>Comment on The case for Vertical Videos by David Neal</title><link>http://vedovini.net/2013/04/the-case-for-vertical-videos/#comment-3631</link> <dc:creator>David Neal</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 22 May 2013 19:14:21 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://vedovini.net/?p=1289#comment-3631</guid> <description><![CDATA[&gt;Videos should have the aspect ratio of the intended display device.so, we should never watch a SD video on our HDTV.  or never watch a movie on our SD TV.  or never watch ... on our not... computer screen.  very silly opinion, i would say.  now, in my iBook and android apps, the screen is locked into portrait orientation.  the video is 720Hx1280V (HD aspect ratio 9x16), so it does pillorbox slightly on the 3x4 (SD aspect ratio) iPad, and even the android devices are not always quite 9x16 (they often have a little extra space on the 9 side).  so, getting a video to exactly match all screens is really impossible, vertical or horizontal.]]></description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&gt;Videos should have the aspect ratio of the intended display device.</p><p>so, we should never watch a SD video on our HDTV.  or never watch a movie on our SD TV.  or never watch &#8230; on our not&#8230; computer screen.  very silly opinion, i would say.  now, in my iBook and android apps, the screen is locked into portrait orientation.  the video is 720Hx1280V (HD aspect ratio 9&#215;16), so it does pillorbox slightly on the 3&#215;4 (SD aspect ratio) iPad, and even the android devices are not always quite 9&#215;16 (they often have a little extra space on the 9 side).  so, getting a video to exactly match all screens is really impossible, vertical or horizontal.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>Comment on The case for Vertical Videos by Claude Vedovini</title><link>http://vedovini.net/2013/04/the-case-for-vertical-videos/#comment-3630</link> <dc:creator>Claude Vedovini</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 22 May 2013 18:06:55 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://vedovini.net/?p=1289#comment-3630</guid> <description><![CDATA[&gt; Vertical video is bad for the sake that it will be projected on primarily horizontal devicesDo you always watch Youtube or Facebook videos in fullscreen? Because I don&#039;t, and I bet most people don&#039;t.]]></description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>> Vertical video is bad for the sake that it will be projected on primarily horizontal devices</p><p>Do you always watch Youtube or Facebook videos in fullscreen? Because I don&#8217;t, and I bet most people don&#8217;t.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>Comment on The case for Vertical Videos by Common sense</title><link>http://vedovini.net/2013/04/the-case-for-vertical-videos/#comment-3629</link> <dc:creator>Common sense</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 22 May 2013 17:59:56 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://vedovini.net/?p=1289#comment-3629</guid> <description><![CDATA[&gt; I will also add that there is currently more than one aspect ratio used in the industry (4:3, 16:9, 3:2, iMAX, Widescreen, CinemaScope, etc.) and I am sure every time a new format appeared, there were trove of bigots to argue this new format was bad.Not a single vertical layout mentioned.Vertical video is bad for the sake that it will be projected on primarily horizontal devices. On the phone itself, it is fine and other handheld devices but these devices do not necessarily favor one orientation over the other. Videos should have the aspect ratio of the intended display device.It&#039;s like shoving a rectangular peg into a circle hole. Yeah, it might be possible to solve the puzzle that way, but really, you should be using the round peg in the round hole.]]></description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&gt; I will also add that there is currently more than one aspect ratio used in the industry (4:3, 16:9, 3:2, iMAX, Widescreen, CinemaScope, etc.) and I am sure every time a new format appeared, there were trove of bigots to argue this new format was bad.</p><p>Not a single vertical layout mentioned.</p><p>Vertical video is bad for the sake that it will be projected on primarily horizontal devices. On the phone itself, it is fine and other handheld devices but these devices do not necessarily favor one orientation over the other. Videos should have the aspect ratio of the intended display device.</p><p>It&#8217;s like shoving a rectangular peg into a circle hole. Yeah, it might be possible to solve the puzzle that way, but really, you should be using the round peg in the round hole.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>Comment on How to change your WordPress password when you lost all hopes by Claude Vedovini</title><link>http://vedovini.net/2013/05/how-to-change-your-wordpress-password-when-you-lost-all-hopes/#comment-3628</link> <dc:creator>Claude Vedovini</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 15 May 2013 21:21:30 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://vedovini.net/?p=1296#comment-3628</guid> <description><![CDATA[Thanks for the info Jeff, I will contact my hosts about that and will update the post if it happens to be something they did :)]]></description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for the info Jeff, I will contact my hosts about that and will update the post if it happens to be something they did :)</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>Comment on How to change your WordPress password when you lost all hopes by Jeff</title><link>http://vedovini.net/2013/05/how-to-change-your-wordpress-password-when-you-lost-all-hopes/#comment-3625</link> <dc:creator>Jeff</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 15 May 2013 11:35:22 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://vedovini.net/?p=1296#comment-3625</guid> <description><![CDATA[Hello,As I had the same problem as you, I went on your post and I spoke with my host.
Here are the results of our research:&quot;We are currently facing several waves bruteforcing interface
Administration Joomla and Wordpress. Following this, we implemented a
system to eliminate this kind of attacks. The rules established
were obviously too strict and prevented access to certain pages.
They have just been adapted this morning...&quot;Since then, the 403 error is gone and the change password is operational again.It is therefore necessary to contact your host to ask him to look at it closely.Wordpress have not involved.Hoping this will help you.Sincerely,
Jeff]]></description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hello,</p><p>As I had the same problem as you, I went on your post and I spoke with my host.<br
/> Here are the results of our research:</p><p>&#8220;We are currently facing several waves bruteforcing interface<br
/> Administration Joomla and WordPress. Following this, we implemented a<br
/> system to eliminate this kind of attacks. The rules established<br
/> were obviously too strict and prevented access to certain pages.<br
/> They have just been adapted this morning&#8230;&#8221;</p><p>Since then, the 403 error is gone and the change password is operational again.</p><p>It is therefore necessary to contact your host to ask him to look at it closely.</p><p>WordPress have not involved.</p><p>Hoping this will help you.</p><p>Sincerely,<br
/> Jeff</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> </channel> </rss>

<!-- W3 Total Cache: Page cache debug info:
Engine:             disk: enhanced
Cache key:          vedovini.net/comments/feed/_index.html
Caching:            disabled
Reject reason:      Page is feed
Creation Time:      0.558s
Header info:
X-Pingback:          http://vedovini.net/blog/xmlrpc.php
Last-Modified:       Sun, 02 Jun 2013 17:09:13 GMT
X-W3TC-Minify:       On
X-Robots-Tag:        noindex,follow
Content-Type:        text/xml; charset=UTF-8
-->